"Work smarter" isn't enough.
⌠because the wrong work, done optimally, is still the wrong work.
And because we avoid the work we were not made for, âwork smarterâ is leaving us bored and diminished and scrolling.
IT CAN BE SO MUCH BETTER.

Itâs a modern-day adage, universally prescribed: âWork smarter, not harderâ. Do more with less, effectively. Not to do less overall, necessarily, but to make the best use of the time youâve got.
âWork smarterâ addresses how you do your work. Itâs compelling because its application has a quick turnaroundâââI can work a little bit smarter by degrees, starting right now, and I can feel good about that immediately.
But if Iâm reading that statement as an individual, it does not acknowledge this: regardless of how smart you might be working, you may be doing the wrong work.
I donât mean âwrongâ as in âtechnically incorrectâ. Iâm talking about the innate: by nature and nurture alike, each of us finds growth in some kinds of work, and finds harmful stress in others. I have two brothers, for exampleâââone is made to build at a keyboard, and one is made to build in a forest, and to force one into the otherâs context would be unkind.
This matters because the right work for you is energizing, restorative. It engages you, and as you grow with it, you improve your surroundings, letting you be even better at what you do. The network effects compound: an environment where people are doing what theyâre made for is fantastic.
The wrong work is unavoidably draining, and you know exactly what Iâm talking about. And when the wrong work is wearing you down, âwork smarterâ lets you work less. Broadly speaking, you will work less. Itâs natural. Youâll protect yourself, using the tools available, and youâll coast rather than suffer. If youâre lucky. If youâre not, âwork smarterâ lets you double down, and youâll suffer accordingly. And so will everyone around you.
Now, imagine an entire culture where each individual is pinned to a career they maybe got to choose in adolescence, in roles so defined that career-hopping is almost impossible. Itâs so normal to be committing your years to the wrong work, to reduce the stress by âworking smarterâ, that the highest accomplishment is the escape of work completely.
Take that in. Vacation, paid time off, unpaid time off, retirement, or figuring out how to look busy: the universal goal, in a culture of the wrong work, is no work.
Now. Imagine another culture, where we default to giving people the right work, work that aligns their talents and personalities and purposes, a culture where changing your work is okay because people change and that reality is respected. Imagine what we could do.
Do you see what weâre missing?
[ a comic strip in which a couple of engineers learn of a new world problem and react with something to the effect of "quick! let's make an app!" ]
This strip hurts. Because, in fact, the tech community is working on this. We (Iâm part of it) have the ability to build a single thing today thatâs used by millions tomorrow, and that makes us responsible. Markets like Etsy and Thumbtack, even apps like Lyft, we-the-engineers are trying to get yâall to your personal right work, collecting the data, testing the algorithms.
You could say weâre trying to work smarter. *headdesk*

Iâve already talked about work in two dimensions: smart vs not, and right vs wrong.
Thereâs a third, and it deals with the future, running from negative to positive with a stop-over for neutral:
Negative work: labor that damages the system of society.
Neutral work: labor that doesnât touch the system, allowing the system to continue in its current direction.
Positive work: labor that heals.
This dimension gets at the substance of the cultural shift we imagine. ⌠and also now we have a three-dimensional fabric of work, and thatâs totally worth exploring. Later. But we can get this far right now: a healthy society is one in which its members are well-suited to where theyâre at; and so, positive, healing work moves us, by degrees, to having the right work be the norm.
And this is where we come full circle: working smarter is not enough.
Because you can do the wrong work really well (and youâll probably hate it, and work less if you can).
And you can do the right work really well (and youâll probably really enjoy it, and work more if you can).
But if you want the system of work to change, you have to choose how you work in the system.
This idea comes the closest Iâve seen to an applied ethical standard for engineers. Weâre totally capable of building really smart tools that give people what theyâre made for, but still result in damage to the system of society. Overgeneralizing to make a point, thatâs Facebook. Itâs a truism at this point: nobody signs off happy.
I keep a running list of things I want to write about. Itâs mixed up with the list of post-hoc recipes. The prompt for this post:
as an engineer, my goal isnât that you work less, itâs that you work on what you were made for
I stand by that, utterly. And Iâll do everything I can to give you the best tools, and to heal the system that has so much say over what work you do.
But we all gotta heal this thing together. Yes, the engineers and the politicians (geez, thatâs the first time Iâve grouped those two together) bear a larger share of the responsibility, by dint of their (our) influence. Thatâs a thing. If youâre in that group, focus up. Build with heart, build to heal. Smart is not enough. Care for the tomorrow that we share. If youâre not in that group, work with heart, work to heal. Be your best, be thoughtfully kind. Everything matters.
And regardless, hold us all accountable. Watch critically for apps and tools and platforms and persons that might solve your problem now but leave us collectively worse off tomorrow. Avoid even the neutralâââprefer the things that are actively improving tomorrow, not those that do nothing.
Smart is not enough, right is not enough, the things we use and do and make must steer positive, and you get to vote with your choices, your time, your dollars.
LETâS GO.

Last updated
Was this helpful?